G'day Justin

Nice job on the fighter looks great. Good activity in the blade, nice shape, and good choice of material. It is hard from a photo to critique fit and finish, you really need to have it in your hand to do that, unless it is a dogs breakfast which this is clearly not.

Only one thing I would be concerned about. If the OAL is 13.5" that would give a handle length of 4.5" which is fine except that with the shape of your handle actual grip would be under 4 inches which could be a bit short. Always think about the effective grip length, in other words from the back of the guard to the last portion of the underside of the handle, not just the total length. Handles with angled butt ends can tricky that way. I have been making changes to those angles over the years and find myself making them steeper as time goes on.

Without having the knife in hand though the paragraph above may not apply, just a thought.

Cheers

Shawn

Hi Justin

Your knife design looks great,and appears to be well executed! The picture looks like the handle and blade look proportional, but the overall measurement of 13/1/2" would make the handle a little short.I have a big hand. A person with a small hand it may fit perfect.

Great Knife!

Russell

Hello Justin, good job on the hamon, it looks really good. I also like the way you brought the hardened portion back along the spine, so that the clip is hardened also, nice. One problem you may have is the quenching in water. Even though W-2 is listed as a water hardening steel, in the sections we normally use it can crack. This can really mess up your day. I would suggest a fast quench oil like parks 50. This will substantially lessen the chance of cracking and give you a good hamon.

Overall I like the shape of the knife, but I have to agree with Shawn and Russell. The handle may be a bit short. Even adding a quarter of an inch can change the look and balance point on the knife. Like Shawn I am also still working with handle shapes and designs and am also going towards a steeper angle in the butt area. More slope towards the blade on the bottom. Still an evolving process. Just curious, where is the balance point on the knife?

Nice work Justin.

Brion

Thanks to everyone for there feedback. Shawn you bring up an intersting point. For my hand the handle is just the right size but I could easily see it being small for someone with large hands. Not knowing the size of the average hand how long do you typically make your handles? I figured I would use my hand unless I was making the knife for a particular user, but you have me rethinking that.

Brion thank you, I do not have the knife in hand but the balance is pretty far forward. This is a problem I run into being self taught, I'm not sure where it should be. I assumed that with a 9" blade and hidden tang the balance will be forward no matter what. I would love to hear your insight on this. The Parks 50 is something I want to try, but money is tight and it is all I can do to keep my propane tanks full.. <img src=' http://www.americanbladesmith.com/ipboard/public/style_emoticons//laugh.gi f' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' /> I had been using canola but was not happy with the hamons I was getting. Straight water was cracking too many so the three seconds in water is my compromise. Most blades are making it through but I do lose some.

The consensus seems to be that the handle is a bit short. If anyone could give me some advice on sizing handles I would appreciate it. Thanks for the help guys, -Justin

Justin, on my bowies, larger ones that is I like the balance point to be just in front of the guard. Maybe 1/2" to 1" in front. I do this by tapering the blade and choice of handle material and guard material. I like ironwood which is a very dense, heavy wood. So that helps in balance. There are some big blades like choppers where the balance point will be farther forward. The main thing I am going for on a fighting knife like a bowie, is that it feels light and quick when you pick it up. My blades when I first started out were on the clunky side. I am still learning and experimenting, but I think they have become better.

Handle length is one of those design questions. I usually go for around 4 3/4" for a hunter, and 4 3/4" to 5" for a bowie. I also will go to the drawing pad and trace the blade. Then I can try different handle shapes and sizes to see which will look the best. A lot of it comes from experience and from using different handles in cutting demos. You will learn what handle shape and size works well.

Canola oil will work fine for some steels, like 5160 or 1084, but for getting hamons is not really fast enough. I think John White said Maxim Oil in Texas had parks 50 for around $75.00 for five gallons. I think Houghton company also makes a fast quench oil.

Keep up the good work.

Brion

Thanks Brion, I went home last night and checked the balance and it is right at 1" from the guard. It got me thinking though that it wouldn't(shouldn't, might not?) be that hard to bring it back onto the guard wich would give the knife a much lighter feel in the hand. Also thanks for the insight on handle size. This is just the kind of help I was hoping for. -Justin

You are welcome Justin. Actually you could add a buttcap to a handle to shift the weight slightly. A lot depends on handle material, handle length, and taper in the blade. Things to play around with. All part of the learning process.

Keep up the good work and the good questions.

Brion

Looks Grest, very nice

Justin- I love it! <img src=' http://www.americanbladesmith.com/ipboard/public/style_emoticons//cool.gi f' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='B)' />

I think your biggest "issue" is the photo more than anything. And I'm sure no Weyer, Eggly, or Coop... so I don't mean that it's not a professional shot, just that it's hard to see all that's going on in the knife with just this photo. Adding several shots from different angles and some up close detail shots would REALLY help us to see what you made.

For example- I'm a hamon freak--- as are my Ms friends that have posted here... and it looks like you've got some SMOKE'N action going on in this steel.... it's just hard to see it. I'd love to get a better look at that hamon. Hamon are incredibly hard to capture in a static photo, so for you to have shown one that well, it's gotta be good. I've found that even a crappy video clip, is a great way to show things you can never get with even a professional photo.

The guard and spacer are great! Nice shape and flow well with the design... But hard to see here. It looks like you even have some line cuts/fluting going on, but it's hard to tell (at least on my computer---hey wait, maybe our laptop is the problem here... <img src=' http://www.americanbladesmith.com/ipboard/public/style_emoticons//huh.gi f' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':huh:' /> <img src=' http://www.americanbladesmith.com/ipboard/public/style_emoticons//wink.gi f' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=';)' /> ). My one small "critique" from this photo would be that the lugs on the guards could be thinner and the actual guard stock could have been thinner to start with. That's a nit-pick based on my personal preference--- some folks think I make my guard lugs TOO thin, so take this all with a grain of salt. <img src=' http://www.americanbladesmith.com/ipboard/public/style_emoticons//laugh.gi f' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' />

Handle shape is GREAT! Flows very well with the overall knife, there looks to be some nice contours, and the material itself is beautiful. Of course I agree with my Ms friends here in that it could be a tad short, but that's based on the dimensions you posted. It doesn't LOOK too short, but as mentioned, you can't know that for sure without having it in hand. My $0.02 on handle length is that it's better to make one a tiny bit too long, than too short. There's no be-all/end-all handle length. My Dad has a friend that is 6'8" and 400#, my entire hand including fingers will nearly fit IN HIS PALM. He HAS to have a handle in the 6.5"-7" length!!! <img src=' http://www.americanbladesmith.com/ipboard/public/style_emoticons//ohmy.gi f' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':o' /> I have another friend with hands about the size of a 10 year old boy and he usually has about 1.5" of handle sticking out while holding one of my knives. Luckily, most of us are somewhere between those 2 extremes. <img src=' http://www.americanbladesmith.com/ipboard/public/style_emoticons//biggrin.gi f' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' />

This is all just my take on your post, and is only worth the paper it's printed on... Er...uh....um. <img src=' http://www.americanbladesmith.com/ipboard/public/style_emoticons//unsure.gi f' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':unsure:' /> <img src=' http://www.americanbladesmith.com/ipboard/public/style_emoticons//wink.gi f' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=';)' /> <img src=' http://www.americanbladesmith.com/ipboard/public/style_emoticons//biggrin.gi f' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' />

I really like your style and am excited to see what you come up with next. <img src=' http://www.americanbladesmith.com/ipboard/public/style_emoticons//cool.gi f' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='B)' />

Thanks guys, sorry it took so long to answer I didn't see your posts till today.

Nick thank you for your feedback, I used most of my alloted picture space on my first two posts,(I actually had to go back and delete a couple to fit this one)so I am sticking to one picture per knife. If your intersted you can see a couple more pictures hereMy link. I've actually hit a bit of a brick wall, I cracked two blades in a row and didn't discover the cracks till after polishing so I have been a bit discouraged. Any way your kind word come at the right time and I feel a bit better about it all now. I saw your bowie in the winter 2010 American Bladesmith and loved the hamon, actually the whole knife. Your handle was the inspiration for several of my first knives. But back to hamons, are you using water or Parks 50 (or something else). I ask because I wasn't getting the kind of activity in my hamons I wanted until I switched to water, but since I assume the cracked blades were because of the water I am seriously considering ordering some Parks. Thanks again, hopefully I'll have more to show soon, -Justin

Hi Justin-

I am new to this forum and didn't know about photo limits/restrictions. I've only posted one knife and am probably already over the limit! <img src=' http://www.americanbladesmith.com/ipboard/public/style_emoticons//ohmy.gi f' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':o' /> <img src=' http://www.americanbladesmith.com/ipboard/public/style_emoticons//biggrin.gi f' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' />

Thank you for the mention of my knife, that really made my day!!! <img src=' http://www.americanbladesmith.com/ipboard/public/style_emoticons//smile.gi f' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':)' />

To answer your question, I am a Park 50 guy. I have friends, the best example is Bill Burke, that can quench in water time and time again with GREAT success.... but I am not one of those guys. I spent over a year trying to figure out water quenching, and the best I got to was about a 70% success rate. Which is really hard to swallow, ESPECIALLY when doing this stuff full time (the mortgage doesn't seem to care if your 30% failure rate came in the form of 5 cracked blades in a row <img src=' http://www.americanbladesmith.com/ipboard/public/style_emoticons//blink.gi f' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' /> ).

Personally, there are a few things that helped ME with water quenching. First was SEVERAL descending thermal cycles to not only REALLY refine the grain, but also to lower the hardenability of the steel. You can actually lower the hardenability of a steel with thermal cycles so much that a blade won't harden in anything but water (or so I believe from shop experience). Second, is using the very bottom of the austenitizing range for your steel... so for W2 I had my best success down around 1435 or so.

I sure don't have it all figured out. I'll nail one blade, and then have to do the next one over six times before I'm happy with it.

I have been doing a lot of differential hardening with just time and temperature lately. It doesn't give quite the same nuances as clay can, but I'm getting a lot of activity and it's a very "natural" look, kind of like the natural swirly action you see in burl wood.... which I like a lot.

Like these two, W2 quenched in Park 50.

Wow!!! Those are gorgeous. So no clay? Are you timing it so only the edge is austentizing? I have been forging knives for around two years with most of my efforts going to producing hamons. I started using water but cracked every blade so switched to cannola oil. I stopped cracking blades but wasn't getting any activity, it obviously was cooling to slowly. So around 6 months ago I started using an interupted water quench, 3 sec. in water, out for 3, then oil till cool. The first few blades didn't crack and the activity was finally what I was looking for. The last few have cracked though leaving my success rate around 75%. Not to bad but like I said two of those knives I didn't discover the cracks till after polishing, and fitting the guard. Thats around two months of my knife making time. So yeah I'm giving serious consideration to Parks 50. I've seen other knives quenched in Parks with great detail but not necassarily activity, your knives have both, so I think it will be worth switching. I just quenched a bowie this afternoon, I'll keep my fingers crossed. If all goes well and I finish the knife I will use the money from its sale to get some oil.

Thanks again for your encouragement and for sharing some of your methods. I'm going to have to try it without clay, -Justin

Thanks Justin <img src=' http://www.americanbladesmith.com/ipboard/public/style_emoticons//smile.gi f' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':)' />

Those two were done in my salt bath, so the whole blade is up to temperature. The "trick" with them is that they had pretty extreme cross sectional geometry (0.300" thick at the guard, tapering to a needle point and ground to ~0.040" at the edge prior to hardening)... which helps out with differential hardening right off the start. Also, I did an interrupted, point down quench into a large vertical tank of Park 50 at about 80degrees. Many folks are heating Park 50 really hot, but the specs call for room temp to warm... not hot.

On these the blades go in the oil for a count of 7, out for 3, and in till cool.

Speaking of Park 50, I was having some issues with a couple of clay hardened blades so I called my friend Stuart Branson (who is doing CRAZY AWESOME clay hardening) to run my process against his. Turns out we were doing everything exactly the same except he was austenitizing in a Fogg style heat treat forge and I was austenitizing in my Paragon (and wasn't thrilled with what I was getting). I reclayed the blades, took them to my forge running around 1450-1460, austenitized and quenched in slightly warmed P50... the hamons I got have more activity that any water quench I've ever done.

So my point, is that P50 really can do some neat things. And even if you don't want to be a hamon seeker, it works exceptionally well for hardening shallow hardening steels. <img src=' http://www.americanbladesmith.com/ipboard/public/style_emoticons//smile.gi f' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':)' />

I bought mine back when it was fairly easy to buy.... I've heard it's really hard to get and very $$$$ now.... but not hearing that "tink" in water is worth a lot of $$$ <img src=' http://www.americanbladesmith.com/ipboard/public/style_emoticons//wink.gi f' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=';)' /> <img src=' http://www.americanbladesmith.com/ipboard/public/style_emoticons//biggrin.gi f' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' />

Thanks Nick for the replies. Cool looking blade and no clay?? Very cool. Yes parks 50 does much better not so hot. I usually use mine at room temp or slightly above and do a interrupted quench also. Usually about ten seconds in then five out. Still playing with that. Parks is available through Maxim Oil company in Texas for like $80 plus shipping for five gallons. Definitely worth getting rid of the tink fairy.

Brion